Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WALGREEN COMPANY v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06258
Defendant:
HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PLIVA, INC., HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
J M SMITH CORPORATION v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04370
Defendant:
HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PLIVA, INC., AKORN, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
J M SMITH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
County of Suffolk v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04893
Defendant:
BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., PLIVA, INC., MYLAN INC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
GENUS LIFESCIENCES INC v. MALLINCKRODT LLC et al
as 5:2019cv05403
Plaintiff:
GENUS LIFESCIENCES INC
Defendant:
SPECGX LLC and MALLINCKRODT LLC
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 5:2019cv03884
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., PURDUE PHARMA, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv01018
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, RICHARD S. SACKLER, PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
