Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00839
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00739
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05193
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04480
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BROWN et al v. ARC COMMUNITY TRUST OF PA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv04540
Defendant: ANDREW COYLE, DDEBORAH MCCORMICK, MARY LARGENT and others
Plaintiff: SHAMAR BROWN, ANTHONY BROWN and SHARON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. BURR et al
as 2:2018cv03751
Defendant: JUDGE CHARLES B. BURR, II, RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION and JUDGE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER
Plaintiff: DANIEL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. SZAMBOTI et al
as 2:2018cv03094
Defendant: ATTORNEY KEVIN BIDLINGMAIER, ATTORNEY MARTIN KING, POLICE OFFICER BARRY SZAMBOTI and others
Plaintiff: DENISE KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYER v. ROSS et al
as 2:2018cv03048
Defendant: JOHN MCGRODY, PHILADELPHIA LICENSE AND INSPECTION BOARD OF REVIEW, LIEUTENANT LISA KING and others
Plaintiff: ANDRE' BOYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01483
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00486
Plaintiff: KIMYETTA KING
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and NANCY QUINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?