Cases 41 - 50 of 81
HAMMON et al v. KENNETT TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01586
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. HAMMON and AMY C. HAMMON
Defendant:
KENNETT TOWNSHIP , SCUDDER G. STEVENS , RICHARD L. LEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
TALBERT v. HOYT et al
as 2:2016cv05544
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CHARLES J. HOYT and AMY BOICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DELGADILLO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2015cv06562
Plaintiff:
JOE DELGADILLO
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT CAMP HILL , JOHN DOE NO. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAEMER v. FONTNO et al
as 5:2015cv05874
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KRAEMER
Defendant:
AMY FONTNO, LEHIGH TRANSITION SERVICES, JOHN MERLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAEMER v. FONTNO et al
as 2:2015cv05874
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KRAEMER
Defendant:
AMY FONTNO, LEHIGH TRANSITION SERVICES, JOHN MERLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COBB-HAYE v. MACLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv04278
Plaintiff:
ROBIN COBB-HAYE
Defendant:
MS. MACLAUGHLIN, LINDA RENICK, ROBERT DAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
