Cases 41 - 50 of 1,517
Doe K.B. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority et al
as 2:2023cv03900
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe K.B.
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Leslie Richards, Kenneth Divers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROSADO v. WHITCRAFT et al
as 2:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES A. WHITCRAFT, JERMIAH F. KANE, PGM REAL ESTATES & ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GIBSON v. TIP TOWING AND RECOVERY, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
RAINY GIBSON
Defendant:
TIP TOWING AND RECOVERY, LLC, JASONE DISENSO, JOHN DOE TOW GUY 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
as 2:2023cv03451
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROSARIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
