Cases 111 - 120 of 20,732
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 2:2024cv01839
Petitioner:
ARCELIA TRUMAINE STOVALL
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Muncy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WARDEN USP CANAAN
as 2:2024cv01833
Petitioner:
MARK WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 2:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
TARAY HERRING
Defendant:
EARL G. KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
RA' SHEEN J BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, CAROLYN NAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. FITZGERALD
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LONG
Defendant:
RICHARD FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. AMOROSO et al
as 2:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
RESHAN SAVAGE BEY
Defendant:
AYLSSA AMOROSO, SGT. POLICE OFFICER BRYAN CARNEY, ANTHONY MICHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VINCENT v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
MARC VINCENT
Respondent:
Superintendent, JOSEPH TERRA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
