Cases 11 - 20 of 91
CORBIN v. JAMES et al
as 5:2022cv04212
Plaintiff:
IAN B. CORBIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN JAMES, ANDREW HOLVECK, JASON KRASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBIN v. FRENCH et al
as 5:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
IAN B. CORBIN
Defendant:
KYLE FRENCH, ANDREW HOLVECK, JOSEPH STAUFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGEE v. ZAKEN et al
as 5:2022cv02650
Petitioner:
KEVIN DOUGLAS MCGEE
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and BERKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: DOUGLAS
as 2:2022cv02829
Petitioner:
CARSON CEDRIC DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PUMBA v. MILLER et al
as 5:2022cv02050
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
STEVE MILLER, DOUGLAS METTE, JOSHUA LEEDBETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUTLER v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BUTLER
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, CITY OF ALLENTOWN, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. KALTESKI et al
as 5:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
SHELBY TYRONE CLARK and SHELBY TYRONE CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
KENNETH KALTESKI, EMIL SOFIA, LILLIAN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNSFORD v. GIVENS et al
as 2:2021cv00610
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER DANTE GIVENS, POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOE, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LUNSFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. EARL
as 2:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
ROLAND GRAHAM and RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
DOUGLAS P. EARL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDINA v. REICHLEY et al
as 5:2020cv05734
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MEDINA
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JUDGE DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY, ATTORNEY SEAN POLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
