Cases 11 - 20 of 26
WELLS v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2015cv03059
Plaintiff:
EDWARD WELLS
Defendant:
M. FARRELL, ABELLO, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSES v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02463
Plaintiff:
ROYAL MOSES
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) CORIZON INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGARRELL v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
SHIRVIN MCGARRELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORO v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv07552
Plaintiff:
RICHARD TORO
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, GIORLA, FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUTIERREZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv06860
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA B. GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, FERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDSAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA/MAYOR NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02158
Plaintiff:
MARLON LINDSAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA/MAYOR NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF/MEDICAL DEPT. C/O CORIZON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KHALID v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02152
Plaintiff:
JARIQ KHALID
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv01549
Plaintiff:
JASON HARDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMAX v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv01078
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LOMAX
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
