Cases 21 - 30 of 728
ABUHADBA v. CHRISTINE
as 2:2023cv02623
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD ABUHADBA
Defendant:
TINA WALKER, E. DAVID CHRISTINE, JR. and MICHELLE A HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALONZO v. TERRA et al
as 2:2023cv02532
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. ALONZO
Defendant:
JOE TERRA, CHARLES HENSELY, LT. DIGUARDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: OBE E.JOHNSON
as 2:2023cv02543
Plaintiff:
OBE E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01962
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SPANN v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE SPANN
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, TIMOTHY HOLMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS et al v. SUPERVISOR SHANNON et al
as 2:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RYAN WILLIAMS, SUPERVISOR SHANNON, SUPERVISOR MAYNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. MEDICAL E. CALIGIURI et al
as 2:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
ANDRE D. LEWIS
Defendant:
MEDICAL E. CALIGIURI, SUPERINTENDENT J. TERRA, DEPUTY SIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, ERICK HELENIHI, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMANUS v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCMANUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH, JACOB E HAMMOND, CHAD L BURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
