Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 215
RYAK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv02184
Petitioner: DEVIN RYAK
Respondent: LAWRENCE KRASNER and JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NECHAB v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01292
Respondent: JOHN WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: MOURAD NECHAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARZA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01179
In Re: EDWARD GARZA
Defendant: CITY OF CHESTER PA, PENNSYLVANIA D.O.C., ET AL, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff: EDWARD R. GARZA, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. STOKES et al
as 2:2021cv01222
Defendant: JENNIFER O. ANDRESS, JOHN WETZEL, DANIEL P. ALVA and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitefield v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant: LAWRENCE KRASNER and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff: Alfred Whitefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00162
Defendant: WELLPATH, JORGE DOMINIC, KEVIN RANSOM and others
Plaintiff: NAFIS ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCULLOUGH v. WETZEL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00091
Petitioner: ANTON MCCULLOUGH
Respondent: JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAZULIS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE, et al.
as 2:2021cv00003
Respondent: Secretary of Correct JOHN WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner: FRANK J. GRAZULIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SINHA v. MASON et al
as 2:2020cv06436
Plaintiff: ARUNABH SINHA, DANIEL BERTHOLF, MR. CHRISTOPHER CASSEL and others
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, MEDICAL COMPANY, I-UNIT SGT. MIDDLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culbert v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2020cv06396
Respondent: SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL and LAWRENCE KRASNER
Petitioner: Stacey Culbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?