Cases 31 - 40 of 121
CARROLL v. BRENNAN et al
as 2:2021cv05505
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MARY BRENNAN, CHARLENE M. LAPRESTE, PHILIP F. PISANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. KRASHNER et al
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ESTATE OF JOHNSON & SHAKENAH JOHNSON and JOSH SHAPIRO
Defendant:
LARRY KRASHNER, ROCHELLE BILAL, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ v. CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv04388
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIETRICH v. HARRY et al
as 5:2021cv04317
Petitioner:
SEAN DIETRICH
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEMUS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv04354
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER LEMUS
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, ESQ. DEBORAH RYAN, A.G. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAXON v. NICHOLAS et al
as 2:2021cv04137
Petitioner:
JEAN SAXON
Respondent:
WENDY NICHOLAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIVERA v. MASON et al
as 5:2021cv03754
Petitioner:
ROBERT RIVERA, JR.
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv03058
Plaintiff:
ZUNIR WALKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POPLAWSKI v. VILARINO et al
as 2:2021cv03084
Defendant:
JAYMMIE M. VILARINO, J.M. POPLAWSKI, HON. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. POPLAWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Kauffman et al
as 2:2021cv03070
Petitioner:
GREGORY DUNBAR
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN, JOSH SHAPIRO and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
