Cases 81 - 90 of 97
GARRETT v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2011cv01888
Plaintiff:
KAREEM GARRETT
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, KEVIN BARNHARDT, FRANCO TASSONE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOSS v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
DARNELL DOSS
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, JOHN BURKHART, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2010cv05945
Plaintiff:
ALLEN PETER BROWN, III
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, TODD BUSKIRK and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv05285
Plaintiff:
RODNEY PETER GRAHAM SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHAWL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYES v. STORM et al
as 2:2010cv04581
Plaintiff:
JOSE REYES
Defendant:
JAMES W STORM, FRANCIS A SANCHEZ, LOUIS SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PETER
as 2:2010cv02567
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
DUANE B. PETER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IBEH v. U.S.A. et al
as 2:2010cv00602
Plaintiff:
KINGSLEY IBEH
Defendant:
FRANK COSTOBILE, OSWALDO TOLEDO, GREGORY YENSAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAUCHET v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
PETER MATTHEW RAUCHET
Defendant:
DELANEY and CFCF (CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ-HERNANDEZ v. MAYNARD
as 2:2009cv04500
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRUZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
PETER DAVID MAYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHRISTINE v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 2:2009cv00886
Plaintiff:
JACOB CHRISTINE
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, RALPH ROMANO, JR., STEVE LUKSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
