Cases 1 - 10 of 14
FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv04652
Petitioner:
JOSE R. FLORES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FLORES-LOPEZ v. LOWE
as 2:2021cv04714
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLORES-LOPEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN CRAIG A. LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLORES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01469
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL FLORES, ESMANUEL FLORES and ESMAUEL FLORES
Defendant:
ROBERT ROSE, BRUCE HERDMAN, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLORES-MEDINA v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 5:2020cv05712
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
JOSE FLORES-MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLORES SECUNDINO v. KELLAR
as 2:2019cv05508
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO FLORES SECUNDINO and MIGUEL SECUNDINO-MARCIAL
Defendant:
OFFICER JAMES KELLAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLMAN et al v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ELLMAN, NIGEL SANTANA, DAVE BELINDA and others
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGLEY, STEPHANIE SMITH, CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00688
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CIRILO FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FLORES v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2016cv05247
Petitioner:
JESUS FLORES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LEHIGH COUNTY, PA and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLAKE v. STAUFFER et al
as 5:2016cv04912
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE BLAKE
Defendant:
JOE STAUFFER, ROBERT FLORES, ERIC PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSITANO v. DALBALSO et al
as 2:2016cv02905
Plaintiff:
ONOFRIO POSITANO
Defendant:
THERESA DALBALSO, TRACI JACOBSON, J. FLORES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
