Cases 1 - 10 of 99
STEWART v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2023cv04512
Plaintiff:
DERRICK STEWART
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and PENNSYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv03926
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Derrick Wilson
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, Shawn A Brown, LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BARNES v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2023cv02080
Petitioner:
DERRICK BARNES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUSER and SCI-BENNER TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBSON v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 2:2022cv04383
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GIBSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, M. BISSER-SIPPLE, BRITTANY HUNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv03766
Petitioner:
DERRICK HARVEY
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, THE DISTRICT OF ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOKES v. CAMPBELL et al
as 5:2022cv02681
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWIN STOKES, JR.
Defendant:
ERIC CAMPBELL, ASHLEIGH KILNER, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBSON v. SOBER et al
as 2:2022cv00953
Petitioner:
DERRICK GIBSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SOBER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLERBE v. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2021cv03806
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, THE STATE (PA) GOVERNMENT and THE LOCAL (PHILA.) GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. FISHER et al
as 5:2021cv02343
Defendant:
DERRICK FISHER, PATRICK BARRETT, JEREMY SCHOENOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
