Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
RA' SHEEN J BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, CAROLYN NAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv04814
Plaintiff:
JERMONT COX
Defendant:
PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S.C.I. PHOENIX ET AL. 1-100, DR. LAUREL R. HARRY ET AL. 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04578
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CURAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAIG v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
RUBEN R. CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, JOHN TERRA, DEPUTY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05541
Plaintiff:
CHERYL JOHNSON, SHAQUEIA JOHNSON and JONATHAN J. JAMES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN OR JANE DOES #1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLENNAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04948
Plaintiff:
AMIR MCCLENNAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, TERRELL FELTS, JEAN CASTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUL-JABBAR et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
SHATISHA ABDUL-JABBAR, AL-AMIN ABDUL-JABBAR, SHARON BELL and others
Defendant:
OFFICER NATHAN LONDON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv03310
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF HEALTH, JOHN AND JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
