Cases 91 - 100 of 2,633
WHITFIELD v. RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04390
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC., GERALD M GORSKI, BONNIE S BIUMI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
GREGORY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20032
Plaintiff:
FRANK GREGORY and WRAY GREGORY
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
NELLOM v. SOBER et al
as 2:2021cv02835
Petitioner:
FRANK NELLOM
Respondent:
SOBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOVER v. LASKOSKIE et al
as 5:2021cv02953
Plaintiff:
LOUIS GEORGE DOVER
Defendant:
PA STATE TROOPER KYLE LASKOSKIE, PA STATE TROOPER FRANK GAWEL and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donato v. TerraVida Holistic Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02870
Plaintiff:
Frank Donato
Defendant:
Christine Visco and TerraVida Holistic Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
MOORE, SR. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2021cv02880
Respondent:
BOROUGH HALL POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD H. BRADBURY, JR., CRAIG A. JOHNSON and others
Petitioner:
JEREMIAH MOORE, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOVER v. TALLARICO et al
as 5:2021cv02425
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M. TALLARICO, FRANK GAWEL and KYLE S. LASKOSKIE
Plaintiff:
LOUIS G. DOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
