Cases 111 - 120 of 777
RODRIGUEZ v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv05364
Plaintiff:
CARLOS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. and WALMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASTILLO v. GUZLEY et al
as 5:2019cv04002
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE CASTILLO
Defendant:
ATTENDING "JOHN DOE", MARISA R. LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, OFFICER BRYAN GUZLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GONZALEZ et al v. BYERS et al
as 2:2019cv04082
Defendant:
TERRY BYERS and AREA STORAGE & TRANSFER INC.
Plaintiff:
ISAURA VALDEZ RODRIGUEZ and JESUS TOLEDO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
INTEGON GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 5:2019cv04281
Defendant:
EDWIN RODRIGUEZ and ELVIS LUNA
Plaintiff:
INTEGON GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOTTONE et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04856
Defendant:
WAL-MART EAST, INC., WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY BOTTONE and JOHN RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RODRIGUEZ v. VIERA et al
as 5:2019cv03969
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
YOLERSY GONZALEZ and ERIKA VIERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04848
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv03988
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN ROBERT WOLFE, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., LORI HEHNLY and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03341
Plaintiff:
GREGG BLANK and JANIE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
