Cases 11 - 20 of 776
RODRIGUEZ ZAPATA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
FRANKLYN De JESUS RODRIGUEZ ZAPATA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BRANCH RETAILER OPERATIONS DIVISION
RODRIGUEZ v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
ANDY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, TIM CARVER and CHRIS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
DEBRA MARIE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
RODRIGUEZ v. GOURLEY
as 2:2023cv04239
Petitioner:
JOAQUIN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL GOURLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERRING v. BERSANI et al
as 2:2023cv03592
Defendant:
KIM A BERSANI, TEOFILA CHECO, STORM CHRISTIAN BERSANI and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD HERRING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CRAIG v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
RUBEN R. CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, JOHN TERRA, DEPUTY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv03461
Plaintiff:
YAMILET RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION and ABC CORP 1-10.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
