Cases 11 - 20 of 187
HOLDEN v. OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02203
Plaintiff:
PAMELA HOLDEN
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILKERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT EASON et al
as 2:2021cv01954
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT EASON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
OTIS WLKERSON and OTIS WILKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03813
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIGHT JR. v. BLAIR et al
as 2:2019cv05107
Defendant:
OTIS BLAIR, THADDEUS KIRKLAND, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK LIGHT JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PYLE v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv04283
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 and OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CYRIL PYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEMUTAMBAH v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03715
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC, PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OTIS R. KEMUTAMBAH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
COMROE et al v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 2:2018cv02288
Plaintiff:
KANDA COMROE and RICHARD COMROE
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILKERSON v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2018cv02203
Petitioner:
OTIS WILKERSON
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
