Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROLLINS v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2013cv07473
Petitioner:
TRENT ROLLINS
Respondent:
KERESTES, PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. ROLLINS et al
as 2:2013cv00766
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES C. ROLLINS, MARLENE ROLLINS and JAMES M. ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
CHERRY et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv04121
Plaintiff:
DERON CHERRY , HOPE CHERRY , MELVIN JONES and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROLLINS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49899
Plaintiff:
BUERL F. ROLLINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROLLINS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41987
Plaintiff:
GARY W. ROLLINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROLLINS v. COUNTY OF BUCKS
as 2:2011cv03234
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ROLLINS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC
as 2:2011cv64839
Plaintiff:
ROLLIN L HUTCHINSON and HARRIET HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROLLINS v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2010cv05958
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
CURTIS W. ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO. et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2010cv05837
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO. and CARL ROLLINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
