Cases 11 - 20 of 31
MOTA-MEDINA et al v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2012cv00969
Plaintiff:
ISA MARIE MOTA-MEDINA , XAVIER SOSA , FREDDY PEREZ-GARABITO and others
Defendant:
CITY OF READING , READING POLICE DEPARTMENT and DANIEL CEDENO-ERAZO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERETE SOSA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55972
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A MERETE SOSA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SOSA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51023
Plaintiff:
CARIN SOSA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SOSA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49076
Plaintiff:
NESTER SOSA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SOSA v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv05077
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SOSA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SOSA et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv34259
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. SOSA , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SOSA et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62305
Plaintiff:
EPIFANIO SOSA and MARY ELLEN SOSA
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOSA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55344
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. SOSA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SOSA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55608
Plaintiff:
MAURO C. SOSA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH et al v. THE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS et al
as 5:2010cv05037
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SMITH , DONNA DOTTERER , S. D. and others
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, HOWARD NELSON, GEORGE BENGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
