Cases 11 - 20 of 36
PACE et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00756
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL CHAD, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN PACE, DONTE WRIGHT and CORTNEY GUYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC v. WRIGHT
as 2:2018cv04764
Respondent:
TOBY L. WRIGHT
Petitioner:
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GRAMA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv03927
Plaintiff:
TOBIE GRAMA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
CARROLL et al v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv01580
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARROLL and MARY CARROLL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY , DENNIS MOLYNEAUX , MALDONALDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRANT et al v. GREB
as 2:2016cv01250
Plaintiff:
BRUCE GRANT and TOBI GRANT
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. GREB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUCKER-SMART v. BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER-SMART
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BEN SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, GANSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCUSKER v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05670
Plaintiff:
JAMES McCUSKER
Defendant:
HIBU PLC , HIBU INC. , MIKE POCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAIRNS v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05671
Defendant:
ELIZABETH G. CHAMBERS, BOB GREGERSON, BOB WIGLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MARK CAIRNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOTEN v. WALSH
as 2:2013cv07347
Petitioner:
TOBY WOOTEN
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
