Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
EMBASSY OF THE BLESSED KINGDOM OF GOD FOR ALL NATIONS CHURCH et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
EMBASSY OF THE BLESSED KINGDOM OF GOD FOR ALL NATIONS CHURCH , GOD'S EMBASSY CHURCH and MYKHAYLYK OLEKSANDR
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DAVYDOV et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv06931
Plaintiff:
ELVEG DAVYDOV and LILIYA KOZMYK
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR, JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv04067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
THOMAS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv02692
Petitioner:
NORMAN ANTHONY THOMAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
MBIZVO v. VILLANOVA UNIVERISTY et al
as 2:2011cv07035
Plaintiff:
GIBONS MBIZVO
Defendant:
VILLANOVA UNIVERISTY, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, REBECCA ZEIGLERMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
