Cases 21 - 30 of 34
STURKEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv03850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. STURKEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , BRUCE HERDMAN, JOHN DOES 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAACS v. TRUSTEES OF DARMOUTH COLLEGE et al
as 2:2013cv05708
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DAVID ISAACS
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE , ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS , MARC BERTRAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CHIDLEY v. TULEJA et al
as 2:2012cv04615
Plaintiff:
COREY CHIDLEY
Defendant:
STEPHEN TULEJA , ABC, INC. and JOHN DOES (1-2)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MYERS v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03660
Plaintiff:
VALERIE MYERS
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITEHEAD v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03662
Plaintiff:
RONELL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORGAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv01615
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FORGAS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
WILLIAMS v. CAMBURN et al
as 2:2010cv03690
Plaintiff:
KARL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RAYMOND CAMBURN, OFICERS JOHN DOE #1-2 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
WILLIS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
MARK WILLIS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , JULIO M. ALGARIN , DENNIS T. MOLYNEAUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMISON v. WELTMAN WEINBERG & REIS et al
as 2:2009cv06080
Plaintiff:
DELLA M. JAMISON and DELLA M. JAMISON
Defendant:
WELTMAN WEINBERG & REIS, DISCOVER BANK and JOHN DOES 1 & 2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
