Cases 31 - 40 of 1,595
ADAMS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 5:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
KRISTI ADAMS
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CARROLL v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2023cv04030
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
CHERYL STEBERGER, HEATHER ADAMS, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ADAME BARAJAS et al v. SAM'S EAST INC. et al
as 5:2023cv03836
Plaintiff:
MARIA ADAME BARAJAS and ALVARO LEMUS PEREZ
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MURSE v. MURSE
as 5:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
ADAM I. MURSE
Defendant:
MARY L. MURSE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 2:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 5:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA and John/Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03643
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ADAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ADAMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
ELIAS ADAMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
