Cases 31 - 40 of 102
BOWERS v. ADAM AND EVE STORES et al
as 2:2015cv04985
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BOWERS
Defendant:
ADAM AND EVE STORES , CALIFORNIA EXOTIC NOVELTIES, LLC and DIAMOND PRODUCTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWERS v. TIFORP, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04158
Plaintiff:
JUANITA BOWERS
Defendant:
TIFORP, INC. and GERALD PICKERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWERS v. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2014cv04359
Plaintiff:
TYRONE BOWERS
Defendant:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
BROCK et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05871
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BROCK , LATANYA BROWN , ROSA BUCHANAN and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWERS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2013cv05550
Petitioner:
MALIK BOWERS
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BALLARD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02244
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BALLARD , DWILDA BALLARD , MICHAEL BASNIGHT and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC., NFL PROPERTIES, L.L.C., RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BOWERS v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2013cv01349
Plaintiff:
HERBERT BOWERS
Defendant:
MICHELLE FARRELL, LOUIS GIORLA, MENTAL HEALTH STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
