Cases 31 - 40 of 160
QUINN et al v. ALAMO RENT A CAR LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03697
Plaintiff:
CAROLE DEMAIO, KATHERINE KOHLER and ANISSA QUINN
Defendant:
EAN HOLDINGS LLC and ALAMO RENT A CAR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUINN v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv02091
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN QUINN
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
QUINN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01681
Plaintiff:
PAMMELA S. QUINN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , KELLY NEAL , CHRISTOPHER MCCUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
KING v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
KIMYETTA KING
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and NANCY QUINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINN v. THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. S001005730
as 2:2017cv05333
Plaintiff:
LINDA QUINN
Defendant:
THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. S001005730
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MITCHELL v. RAHILL et al
as 2:2017cv03730
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
PATRICK QUINN, GEORGE RAHILL, THOMAS MARTINKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEDRO v. CITY FITNESS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03542
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
CITY FITNESS, LLC, WHARTON STREET FITNESS, LLC, WALNUT STREET FITNESS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02432
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WESTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, DIDONATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
