Cases 31 - 40 of 267
WILLIAMS-TUCKER v. SILVERSTEIN et al
as 2:2021cv02927
Defendant:
DEBRA SILVERSTEIN, JAKE ADAMS SILVERSTEIN, A'MIER SILVERSTEIN and others
Plaintiff:
FAHTIMA WILLIAMS-TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
TUCKER v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01215
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and IC SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
LEORA TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TUCKER v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00111
Defendant:
"XYZ CORP", MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., "JANE DOE" and others
Plaintiff:
JOE TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00085
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, INC., TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TITTERTON et al v. JENKINTOWN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2020cv05869
Defendant:
JENKINTOWN BOROUGH, CHIEF ALBERT DIVALENTINO, RICHARD TUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KELLY and EDWARD TITTERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05513
Plaintiff:
TAMAYAH TUCKER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VURIMINDI v. ANHALT et al
as 2:2020cv05368
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Defendant:
LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, ESQ, LAWRENCE KRASNER, ESQ, JUDGE DIANA L. ANHALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP et al
as 2:2020cv04966
Defendant:
DEBRA ELAINE TUCKER, FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP d/b/a FARMERS INSURANCE, FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
DAISY LARCENA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
