Cases 41 - 50 of 118
BRIM MARKETING, LLC et al v. SMART CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL, LLC
as 2:2017cv00578
Plaintiff:
BRIM MARKETING, LLC and BRAD VESPE
Defendant:
SMART CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALBERT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, JOHN J. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAYMOND v. LEVINE et al
as 2:2016cv00616
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAYMOND
Defendant:
BRAD LEVINE , APRIL LEVINE , TINA GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., CARL A. HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. STAAB et al
as 2:2015cv05489
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
JOE STAAB, PHILADELPHIA ITERNAL AFFARS, CHARLES RAMSAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. MID-ATLANTIC ENERGY CONCEPTS, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv04060
Plaintiff:
JEAN BLACK
Defendant:
MID-ATLANTIC ENERGY CONCEPTS, INC., BRAD SALAMONE and PAUL OLIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. O'CONNOR et al
as 2:2015cv03475
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID O'CONNOR, BRAD MOMME, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MOMME et al
as 2:2015cv02807
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
BRAD MOMME, DAVID O'CONNOR, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTKOWSKI v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01831
Plaintiff:
BRAD BARTKOWSKI
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and VERIZON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
