Cases 41 - 50 of 56
DONAHUE et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80442
Plaintiff:
HELEN C. DONAHUE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, ACANDS, INC., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRETT v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2010cv03797
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
JOHN DONAHUE, PAUL DONAHUE and LAURA GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CODY et al v. BUTERA et al
as 2:2010cv03582
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E. CODY, SR. and KELLYANN R. CODY
Defendant:
JOHN C. BUTERA, SHARON L. ROSENBERGER, PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION OF AGING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DONAHUE v. SOUDERS et al
as 2:2010cv02761
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER DONAHUE
Respondent:
SOUDERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DONAHUE v. USA DIRECT, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01272
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DONAHUE
Defendant:
USA DIRECT, INC. and VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS, CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DONAHUE v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31901
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W. DONAHUE
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DONAHUE et al v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv60290
Plaintiff:
KEVIN P DONAHUE and DONNA DONAHUE
Defendant:
AC&S INC, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DONAHUE v. GARCIA
as 2:2009cv02585
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DONAHUE
Defendant:
GUILLERMO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GRAHAM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv02473
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN KAY, WILLIAM DONAHUE and others
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DONAHUE v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv91840
Plaintiff:
GENE DONAHUE and GENE DONAHUE
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
