Cases 41 - 50 of 96
GOMEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv02097
Plaintiff:
PIERRE GOMEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, CLAUDE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIERRE v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2017cv05327
Plaintiff:
ALEX H. PIERRE
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Whistle Blower Law
MCCALL et al v. IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv02718
Plaintiff:
PIERRE A. MCCALL and ADRIENNE ALEXANDER-MCCALL
Defendant:
IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERRE v. US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2017cv01692
Plaintiff:
DONY PIERRE
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERRE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2017cv01330
Plaintiff:
DONY PIERRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Movant:
MICHAEL JP WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HARMON et al v. FMC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv06073
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW B. HARMON and SUSAN H. CLARKE
Defendant:
FMC CORPORATION , EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE OF FMC CORPORATION , PIERRE BRONDEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PAYEN v. BAUSMAN et al
as 2:2016cv05276
Plaintiff:
VILDROPHE PIERRE PAYEN
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
LAROSILIER v. JBS USA, LLC
as 2:2016cv01356
Plaintiff:
PIERRE ANDRE LAROSILIER
Defendant:
JBS USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
