Cases 51 - 60 of 122
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv05459
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GARY GLAZER, JOHN M. YOUNGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2015cv05062
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOLEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04651
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GARY GLAZER, JOHN M. YOUNGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FATTAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv04165
Plaintiff:
CHAKA FATTAH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANGER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2015cv03610
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LANGER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FATTAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
CHAKA FATTAH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER v. UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND et al
as 2:2013cv06648
Plaintiff:
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SAMAHON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2013cv06462
Plaintiff:
TUAN SAMAHON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06148
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
