Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 60 of 282
DIAZ et al v. WOODS SERVICES
as 2:2019cv00985
Defendant: WOODS SERVICES
Plaintiff: CARMEN DIAZ and ABRAHAM DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIAZ v. SCI GREEN
as 2:2019cv00322
Plaintiff: ISRAEL DIAZ
Defendant: SCI GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv05075
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: EVELYN NIEVES DIAZ
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DIAZ MACHADO v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04458
Plaintiff: ALFREDO DIAZ MACHADO
Defendant: EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., BONNEVILLE BILLING AND COLLECTIONS, INC., ACCOUNT SERVICES COLLECTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04166
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04022
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DIAZ v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2018cv03742
Plaintiff: LEONARDO DIAZ
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DIAZ v. MCGINLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03575
Petitioner: RANDY DIAZ
Respondent: THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIAZ v. FULINO
as 2:2018cv03373
Defendant: WALTER FULINO
Plaintiff: ISRAEL DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. FERGUSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01996
Plaintiff: RAUL DIAZ
Defendant: TAMMY FERGUSON, JAMES MEINTEL, GEORGE ONDREJKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?