Cases 51 - 60 of 60
FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. et al v. THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
as 2:2009cv04607
Plaintiff:
FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDIA PHOTOGRAPHERS, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
QUINTANA
as 2:2009mc00171
Petitioner:
JOSE QUINTANA
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE HARLINGEN, TX 78590 and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GEN. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KAUR v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2009cv02550
Plaintiff:
PARVINDER KAUR
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, MICHAEL AYTES, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CAGGIANO v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009mc00071
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CAGGIANO
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK J. KAPPELHOFF
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DIAKHITE v. DECKER et al
as 2:2009cv00550
Petitioner:
MOUNA DIAKHITE
Respondent:
THOMAS R. DECKER, JAMES T. HAYES, JR., JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
