Cases 51 - 60 of 178
MADISON v. FISHER et al
as 2:2014cv05998
Plaintiff:
YVETE MADISON
Defendant:
MICHAEL FISHER, THOMAS VANASKIE and RUGGERO ALDISERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANCALEONI v. MADISON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv05032
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH BRANCALEONI
Defendant:
MADISON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MADISON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv03055
Plaintiff:
YVETTE MADISON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE - 22ND DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADISON v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA. et al
as 2:2014cv02934
Plaintiff:
YVETTE MADISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA. and THOMAS ED O'NEILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADISON v. NEIFEILD et al
as 2:2014cv02844
Plaintiff:
YVETTE MADISON
Defendant:
MARSHA NEIFEILD, DAVID SHUTTE and CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTAZZO v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2014cv02513
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CORTAZZO
Defendant:
CITY OF READING , WILLIAM M. HEIM , MADISON WINCHESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADISON v. ROTH et al
as 2:2014cv01544
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MADISON
Defendant:
MIKE ROTH and LEASE AND RENTAL MANAGEMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
MADISON v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv07012
Petitioner:
ALFONZO EDWARD MADISON
Respondent:
JERRY WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRENNAN et al v THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSLYVANIA
as 2:2013cv06635
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. BRENNAN , COLLEEN CARLIN , WILLIAM L. JOERGER , III and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSLYVANIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
