Cases 51 - 60 of 97
LAROSILIER v. JBS USA, LLC
as 2:2016cv01356
Plaintiff:
PIERRE ANDRE LAROSILIER
Defendant:
JBS USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSA-PIERRE v. SHARP et al
as 5:2015cv06001
Plaintiff:
HEIDY ROSA-PIERRE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN SHARP and CAMPBELL'S AUTO EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERRE et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv05808
Plaintiff:
LINDA PIERRE and YVANAIS PIERRE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVILSON et al v. JUAREZ
as 2:2015cv02494
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE DAVILSON and MARIE PIERRE
Defendant:
RUBEN JUAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEJESUS et al v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
as 2:2013cv04940
Plaintiff:
CARL A. DEJESUS, CARL TALTON and PIERRE FOLKS
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERRE-LOUIS et al v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2013cv03503
Plaintiff:
JEAN F. PIERRE-LOUIS and MARIE B. PIERRE-LOUIS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JEAN-GILLES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv02109
Plaintiff:
MAX JEAN-GILLES , TITUS ADAMS , MIRANDA ADAMS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JACOBS v. COOK et al
as 2:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
KENNITH ALONZO JACOBS
Defendant:
COOK, J.J. MITCHELL, FUNELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACKOUREY v. MOHAN INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2012cv06730
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
MOHAN INCORPORATED, MOHAN CUSTOM CLOTHIERS, PIERRE CUSTOM CLOTHIERS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
