Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 70 of 324,115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02412
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02413
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Beiler Brothers Roofing v. SWEIGART et al
as 2:2024cv02401
Plaintiff: Beiler Brothers Roofing
Defendant: TRAVIS S SWEIGART and Raynes & Lawn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FMC CORPORATION v. SHARDA USA LLC
as 2:2024cv02419
Plaintiff: FMC CORPORATION
Defendant: SHARDA USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BURWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02415
Plaintiff: HISHINEA SILEAKA IMEANA BURWELL
Defendant: Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02404
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FATA
as 5:2024cv02402
Not Yet Classified: ABRAHIM FATA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. CO 1 DUNSTON et al
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff: WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant: CO 1 DUNSTON and THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schutts et al v. The University of the Arts
as 2:2024cv02420
Plaintiff: Brad M. Schutts, Laura Grutzeck, Carolina Blatt and others
Defendant: The University of the Arts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Beiler Brothers Roofing v. SWEIGART et al
as 5:2024cv02401
Plaintiff: Beiler Brothers Roofing
Defendant: TRAVIS S SWEIGART and Raynes & Lawn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?