Cases 71 - 80 of 209
PALMER v. WEINTRAUB et al
as 2:2013cv04939
Plaintiff:
WALTER C. PALMER
Defendant:
MATHEW WEINTRAUB and NICHOLE LAKEAUWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv04383
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NICHOLS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NICHOLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv02707
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NICHOLS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TAYLOR v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2013cv01269
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE TAYLOR
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SUMPTER v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv00988
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE SUMPTER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DONNELLY v. INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al
as 2:2012cv05661
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DONNELLY
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, JAMES A. WILLIAMS, ART AIVALIOTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
THOMPSON v. CONCEPCION-NIEVES et al
as 2:2012cv04404
Plaintiff:
JOE LAMONT THOMPSON
Defendant:
RAPHAEL CONCEPCION-NIEVES, COREY MOORE, RAYMOND LACEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04381
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC AUSTIN , STEPHEN AVERY , LATUANA BLAIR and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
