Cases 1 - 10 of 53
HOPKINS v. WELBILT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04053
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
WELBILT, INC., CYNTHIA M EGNOTOVICH, DINO J BIANCO and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H4-8-5 et al
as 5:2019cv01133
Defendant:
CONSTANCE C. JOHNSON, A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H4-8-5 and ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv06391
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE 24TH DISTRICT
as 2:2016cv05521
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C. JOHNSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE 24TH DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZHENG v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05251
Plaintiff:
DAMI ZHENG
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
NI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05250
Plaintiff:
WEI LE NI
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
HAHSY v. KERRY et al
as 2:2016cv04312
Plaintiff:
SONA HAHSY
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY, MICHELE THOREN BOND, PHILLIP SLATTERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
