Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 263
RAMOS et al v. WALMART INC.
as 2:2024mc00026
Plaintiff: JACQUELINE RAMOS and EDWIN JOHNSON
Defendant: WALMART INC.
Petitioner: VANESSA TWYMAN
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff: MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant: RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00816
Plaintiff: LUIS RAMOS
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
RAMOS v. BANK et al
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff: JUAN RAMOS
Defendant: JACQUELIN BANK and SHANARA PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
RAMOS-VARGAS v. HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS
Defendant: HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BACA et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff: FRANKIE BACA, MARY CAREY, CANDISE COLLINS and others
Defendant: BAYER CORP., BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01789
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
COLBERT v. MULROONEY et al
as 2:2023cv00857
Plaintiff: ASHAN COLBERT
Defendant: TIM MULROONEY, SGT. DIORIO, SGT. RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00288
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
RAMOS QUINONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv04770
Plaintiff: MICHELLE RAMOS QUINONES
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?