Cases 1 - 10 of 41
FAGGIOLO v. BOROUGH OF RIDLEY PARK et al
as 2:2023cv04920
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO NICHOLAS FAGGIOLO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RIDLEY PARK, MICHELLE PORTNOFF, ROBERT P. DADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAGGIOLO v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2023cv01904
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO NICHOLAS FAGGIOLO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE, DELAWARE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU TAX CLAIM BUREAU, JOHN VAN ZELST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER et al v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITIES et al
as 2:2022cv03639
Plaintiff:
STAMAR RICHARD MILLER, JAHMAD LOCKITT, BRIAN LOWRIE and others
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITIES and WARDEN L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
TINDAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05351
Petitioner:
ALPHONSO TINDAL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03548
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO WILLARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TINDAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06885
Petitioner:
ALPHONSO MARVIN TINDAL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GREER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2014cv06344
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO GREER, 3RD
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
