Cases 1 - 10 of 20
DAVIS v. BERK COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 5:2019cv03893
Petitioner:
IVAN B. DAVIS
Respondent:
LINDA LUDGATE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF : __________________________, BERK COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv05400
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY B. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv05087
Defendant:
LISA DURAND, C/O B. DAVIS, C/O LAIUVARA and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBATO et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2012cv03358
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARBATO, II and TERRY F. BARBATO
Defendant:
DENNIS B. DAVIS and LESLIE LOCKHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54831
Plaintiff:
JACK B DAVIS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DAVIS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv37986
Plaintiff:
JEAN B DAVIS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DAVIS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37983
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. DAVIS and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DAVIS et al v. BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORP.
as 2:2011cv37987
Plaintiff:
JEAN B DAVIS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAVIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30338
Plaintiff:
ROGER B. DAVIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC, ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
