Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFFMAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03550
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY COFFMAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFMAN v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv03167
Plaintiff:
DEAN F. COFFMAN, JR.
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
COFFMAN v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC
as 2:2014cv03108
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN I. COFFMAN
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFMAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56239
Plaintiff:
ROBERT I. COFFMAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COFFMAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53931
Plaintiff:
MARTIN T. COFFMAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COFFMAN et al v. ANCHOR PACKING CO. et al
as 2:2010cv82676
Plaintiff:
CORRINE J. COFFMAN and DON R. COFFMAN
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO., ATLAS ASBESTOS CO., INC., A.W. CHESTERTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFMAN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70064
Plaintiff:
ULAS G. COFFMAN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
