Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BROWN v. PEDONE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02717
Plaintiff: BRIAN L. BROWN
Defendant: A. PEDONE, R. THOMAS, T. GALELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAXTON-COLLIS et al v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv06165
Plaintiff: JOY ANNE PAXTON-COLLIS and EUGENE F. COLLIS
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ICLUB INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP v. COLLIS et al
as 2:2013cv00688
Plaintiff: ICLUB INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
Defendant: STEVEN H. COLLIS , CHARLES H. COTROS , RICHARD C. GOZON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DAVIS et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67507
Plaintiff: WELDON DAVIS and COLLIE DAVIS
Defendant: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENGLAND et al v. KEENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv60560
Plaintiff: COLLIE ENGLAND and ANNA ENGLAND
Defendant: KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLIE et al v. ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
as 2:2010cv83227
Plaintiff: ANTHONY COLLIE
Defendant: ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLIE v. ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
as 2:2010cv82962
Plaintiff: ARLEEN COLLIE
Defendant: ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPER, JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52565
Plaintiff: COLLIE LOPER, JR.
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?