Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PERRY v. FADDIS, et al
as 2:2022cv04012
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
OFFICER MELANIE FADDIS, OFFICER ANDREW MILLARD, OFFICER SERGEANT MATTHEW KUHNERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. DAEMER et al
as 2:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DEVON DAEMER, ACE CHUBB, DREAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION v. SUBURBAN EMS
as 5:2019cv03614
Defendant:
SUBURBAN EMS
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
STEWART v. ENVISION HEALTHCARE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv01436
Defendant:
EMS MANAGEMENT LLC, CHARLES SCHWAB BANK, ENVISION HEALTHCARE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HEAGY v. CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2017cv04394
Plaintiff:
TYLER T. HEAGY
Defendant:
CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALFREDO ORTIZ, SCOTT S. SCHMITTINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMES v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv06803
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EMES
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
EME NEVADA INC. v. LUX PRODUCTS CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv02707
Plaintiff:
EME NEVADA INC.
Defendant:
LUX PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUX PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. EME NEVADA INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02465
Defendant:
EME NEVADA INC. and EDWIN MCAULEY ELECTRONICS LTD.
Plaintiff:
LUX PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MERIX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION et al v. CLINICAL SUPPLIES MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2013mc00154
Plaintiff:
MERIX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
CLINICAL SUPPLIES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Movant:
JOHN MEENAN and EMS ACQUISITION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
