Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04529
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04532
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ASULFAT et al v. NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03845
Plaintiff:
Missionary Church of Jesus Christ of the Good Samaritan Incorporated and WESLY ASULFAT
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SANDERS GOODING v. BURLOTOS et al
as 2:2024cv02684
Defendant:
ELENI BURLOTOS and USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
SELENA SANDERS GOODING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
JAMES GOODE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PAMELA SMITH, ET AL v. USAA
as 2:2023cv04425
Plaintiff:
PAMELA AND DAVID SMITH AND GOOD, PAMELA SMITH and DAVID GOOD
Defendant:
USAA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GOOD v. TICE et al
as 5:2023cv04319
Petitioner:
CRAIG GOOD
Respondent:
TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04181
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SERGEANT TAMIKA ALLEN, POLICE OFFICER JAHBRIA GEDDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
