Cases 1 - 10 of 94
IN RE: KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY
as 2:2024cv02102
Petitioner:
KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY and DR. EUGUNE DONALD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOODWIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04708
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN and MICHAEL GOODWIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CAPTAIN JAMES CLARK, DETECTIVE JAMES PITTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04429
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ALI BEY v. MCCUTCHEON et al
as 2:2019cv00531
Petitioner:
KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY and EUGENE GOODWIN
Respondent:
EDNA MCCUTCHEON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LARRY KRASNER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODWIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv05269
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODWIN et al v. PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv00820
Plaintiff:
JAMES GOODWIN and TRACEY GOODWIN
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODWIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2017cv02753
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA MARIE GOODWIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
