Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
COFFIN et al v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2021cv04158
Plaintiff: CECELIA COFFIN and MARK COFFIN
Defendant: DANIEL J. BUTLER, PRIME HOSPITALITY, INC. doing business as PRIME BRANDYWINE PRIME SEAFOOD, CONCORD XING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. FARRELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06049
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SCOTT
Defendant: WILLIAM J. FARRELL, DAVID J. TIGHE, MATTHEW J. FARLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUTLER v. UNITED STATES LINES INC.
as 5:2011cv54065
Plaintiff: EDWARD J. BUTLER
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BUTLER v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv54354
Plaintiff: EDWARD J. BUTLER
Defendant: ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BUTLER v. NRM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv87236
Plaintiff: REX J. BUTLER and REX J. BUTLER
Defendant: NRM CORPORATION, MCNEIL (OHIO) CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BUTLER v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01945
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY J. BUTLER
Defendant: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and F.C. KERBECK & SONS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BUTLER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67225
Plaintiff: GERALD J. BUTLER
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
RAZZOLI v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2007cv02968
Plaintiff: KEVIN RAZZOLI
Defendant: HARLEY LAPPIN, Us Parole Commission, DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABRAMSON v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP.
as 2:2005cv20110
Plaintiff: DOLORES Y. ABRAMSON, ROZ ADENBAUM, MARY P. ALBERSON and others
Defendant: AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP., A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., WYET LABORATORIES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?