Cases 1 - 10 of 38
KING v. LYNCH et al
as 5:2017cv00884
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH and THOMAS E. BRANDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BEERS et al v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2016cv06440
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BEERS and JOSEPH DIVITA
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL , TOBACCO, FIREAR,S AMD EXPLOSIVES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv06391
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PULOTOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv06067
Plaintiff:
NEMAT PULOTOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
FRANKS v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2016cv05565
Petitioner:
JAMES FRANKS
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, SETH WILLIAMS and LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAYEN v. BAUSMAN et al
as 2:2016cv05276
Plaintiff:
VILDROPHE PIERRE PAYEN
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
AHMEDOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv04976
Plaintiff:
ABDURASHID AHMEDOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
