Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BDC ADVISORS, LLC v. SEARS et al
as 2:2022mc00071
Plaintiff:
BDC ADVISORS, LLC
Defendant:
KEVIN SEARS, LUMIS ADVISORS, LLC and CHRISTOPHER SUKENICK
Respondent:
LOVELL HARMON and DOCPOWER LLC
WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM RETAIL, LLC v. LOVELL et al
as 5:2022cv04617
Plaintiff:
WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM RETAIL, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN LOVELL and CHARMING CHARLIE MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BOWERS v. LOVELL
as 2:2022cv04323
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWERS
Defendant:
DAMON ROMEL LOVELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
WEAVER v. ESTOCK et al
as 5:2022cv03872
Petitioner:
LOVELLE WEAVER
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOVELL v. GUARDIAN RESTORATION, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01449
Plaintiff:
MARIA LOVELL
Defendant:
GUARDIAN RESTORATION, INC. and JASON KLUSKA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WEAVER v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2016cv04811
Petitioner:
LOVELLE KINON WEAVER
Respondent:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCMILLAN v. WILKIE TRUCKING INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07104
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCMILLAN
Defendant:
WILKIE TRUCKING INC. and RANDY LOVELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05878
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY JONES , SHARON R. JONES , FURMAN KERR and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KNIGHT v. H.O.C., HOUSE OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2013cv01208
Plaintiff:
LOVELL T. KNIGHT
Defendant:
H.O.C., HOUSE OF CORRECTION, HOBERT and ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
