Cases 1 - 10 of 70
MIDDLETON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03166
Plaintiff:
ANNE YAGLE MIDDLETON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. JOHN MIDDLETON COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN MIDDLETON COMPANY, ALTRIA GROUP, INC., LEIGA IMPORT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURRAY v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2022cv02370
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN MURRAY
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, OFFICER SMITH-GRIFFIN, OFFICER MIDDLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINHA v. MASON et al
as 2:2020cv06436
Plaintiff:
ARUNABH SINHA, DANIEL BERTHOLF, MR. CHRISTOPHER CASSEL and others
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MEDICAL COMPANY, I-UNIT SGT. MIDDLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MIDDLETON et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00319
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MIDDLETON and LINDIA MIDDLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIDDLETON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05289
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MIDDLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middleton v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv20007
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Edna Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peale et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20122
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Speidel, Edna Middleton, James Santo and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MIDDLETON v. BLOSSOM PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv03249
Defendant:
BLOSSOM PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MIDDLETON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
